To say that I was looking forward to seeing The Hunger Games
would be a dramatic understatement. I started reading the books last year, after
my Twitter feed suddenly lit up with talk of the film on the day that the first
pictures of Jennifer Lawrence as Katniss were released, and I found myself
hooked immediately. As the film drew closer I did however find myself slightly
worried that it couldn’t live up to the hype. After all, it was the relentless
tension that kept me glued to the book, and now that I knew the story, would
the film be able to recreate that rush that I got at the end of every chapter?
Fortunately, the answer is no. Yes, you read that right. The film is not as
intense as the book in a lot of ways, but it has a gripping presence that is
all it’s own. In condensing the source material the film manages to be both
enjoyable for fans of the book, who will no doubt be flocking to cinemas, as
well a great film in it’s own right, one that will hopefully introduce a lot
more people to Katniss Everdeen.
District 11 watches on in one of the film's more powerful moments, and it's single fleeting visit to any district other than 12.
Some changes have
been made to the original story, understandably as even at a whopping 142
minutes there are definitely parts of the film that feel a bit rushed, and for
the most part these changes improve the story. For example, the single, and
very brief, sequence in the film that addresses the death of Katniss’ father is
extremely powerful, and the reduced emphasis on the strained relationship
between Katniss and her mother is very welcome. Likewise, changes to the origin
of the Mockingjay pin are understandable in that it removes a character who was
always a little unnecessary and strengthens the bond between Katniss and
Primrose more effectively. There are, however, other changes and omissions that
don’t quite fare as well. A lot of the background information about Panem isn’t
made clear in the movie, indeed even the name Panem is barely mentioned, and
very little is seen of any of the other districts. The symbolism of the
Mockingjay itself also goes completely unmentioned in this first film, and the
Muttations in general are played down in the movie, a blessing in the final
scenes as I always felt that the book’s interpretation of the wolf-like
creatures went a bit overboard. I did
however feel that the Mockingjay needed more explanation, as it’s a detail that
becomes quite important later on, I can only assume therefore that it will
instead come in later films. Less important to the story, but slightly frustrating,
are the Avoxes, who appear in the film, but are never mentioned by name or
explained outside of a brief comment from Gale mentioning the Capitol cutting
out tongues. All in all, the story works, and for those who haven’t read the
books most of the cuts will obviously be a non-issue.
The acting is consistently great, even if a lot of the
characters have drastically reduced parts to play in the film. The film is
undoubtedly all about Jennifer Lawrence, and she plays Katniss perfectly, imbuing
her with the heart that the character always seemed to be lacking in the book.
Lawrence has fantastic screen presence and I think she’s got a long career in
film ahead of her. Josh Hutcherson is not quite as amazing as Peeta, but he
plays the part well enough, and he does sell the star-crossed lovers act very well. Practically everyone else in the film is playing a
bit part to be honest, Gale looks pretty and glares at a screen a few times and
that’s about it, Elizabeth Banks does her best to shine in what little screen
time she has as the garish Effie Trinket, and Lenny Kravitz makes for a
surprisingly good Cinna, though again his role is very small. Haymitch’s
reduced role in the film is perhaps most criminal of all. Woody Harrelson does
his best but the film lacks the material that made Haymitch such a great
character in the book. His previous win is barely mentioned, his struggle to
become sober in order to help Katniss and Peeta train for the games is woefully
underdeveloped, and his presence during the games is much less prevalent. We do
however get to see a lot more of President Snow and Seneca Crane, as well as
the whole process of creating the games in general, which is admittedly very
interesting to watch.
More than anything the film is a blockbuster that doesn’t
feel like a blockbuster. It’s got a quiet intensity boiling away throughout the
whole film that’s really captivating, and it feels quite small in scale compared
to other big blockbuster movies, with a much more subtle, personal touch than your usual big Hollywood movie. There’s not an awful lot of in-your-face CG work in
the movie, no forced 3D, and no overbearing, sentimental score, just a gripping story. The film is for
the most part very well-paced, never resting for too long, though the ending
whizzes by very quickly, without really giving itself time to sink in, except
to make it clear that a sequel is on the way. It’s got a realistic edge that really
serves the story well, and the shaky-cam technique is instrumental in this,
adding to the gritty reality TV feel that the games are going for, though at
times it is a little too much. It’s apparent early on that the director does
not have a whole lot of experience with action sequence, and the final fight
with Cato on top of the Cornucopia is an almost unwatchable blur. I get that actually
showing teenagers killing teenagers would’ve pushed their rating up further
than they liked, but some of the more intense clashes do suffer because of this
inability to show anything too graphic. Overall, the film has a lot more
successes than it has failures, it’s a great film on it’s own merits, and it’s
a pleasure to see a franchise that I love being dealt with by such capable
hands, I can only hope that Catching Fire will be as compelling when it arrives
next year.
No comments:
Post a Comment